Talk:David Broderick Tower

	Michigan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Michigan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Michigan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MichiganWikipedia:WikiProject MichiganTemplate:WikiProject MichiganMichigan articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Detroit task force.

Skyscrapers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skyscrapers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles that relate to skyscrapers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkyscrapersWikipedia:WikiProject SkyscrapersTemplate:WikiProject SkyscrapersSkyscraper articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Architecture Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class because it uses the [[Category:Michigan stub]] on the article page.

If you agree with this assessment, please remove this message.
If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the {{WikiProject Michigan|class=start|importance=}} above to the appropriate class and removing the stub template from the article.

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 03:21, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Inline citations have been fixed. This article should possibly be rated above a stub?

Sod2008 (talk) 05:24, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

David Broderick Tower

I read the noted article on the Tower and when I clicked on the highlighted name of David Broderick, a biography of David C. Broderick appeared. I am note sure what the inference means, but David F. Broderick and David C. Broderick have no relationship. David F. has roots in counties Limerick and Kerry in Ireland, but was raised in Hartford, CT in his early years.

As verification of the information, I am the only nephew of David F. Broberick and his closest living relative is his sister and she is a strong 98 years old.

My e-mail address is jjmcauliffe4@aol.com

```` —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.16.166.25 (talk) 15:48, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Added building collapse information, as well as inline citations.

Sod2008 (talk) 05:23, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:WylandWhales.jpg Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:WylandWhales.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests February 2012

What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:WylandWhales.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 00:05, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]